Chick-Fil-A
has mighty good food, their chicken is far healthier than a burger and fries,
and they promote healthy eating and other positive life style choices. One
thing that Chick-Fil-A has done wrong though, is having an aggressive anti
homosexual stance, or as they would put it; a pro heterosexual stance. It was recently uncovered that Chick-Fil-A
donated more than 5 million dollars to Christian organizations with an anti gay
agenda. It would be one thing if
Chick-Fil-A donated to unbiased Christian organizations or no organization at
all. Although every person has a right to their own personal beliefs and
ideals, a company also has the ability to make a political stance whether or
not it be an advantageous business practice. Discrimination is different, when
a company openly admits to supporting organizations that support the ostracizing
and discrimination of a minority, it not only questions the company’s business
practices, but it validates the erroneous belief that homosexuals are different
and their life choices are to be judged and scrutinized. This country is a free
country, a country where a business can say whatever they want about whomever
they want. We as a free people can openly decided which business we decide to
patronize based on their products and their beliefs. I certainly will not
patronize a business that preaches discrimination and intolerance towards anybody,
no matter how good their food is.
Hello Gabe!
ReplyDeleteI agree with you. However the irony is that discrimination is wrong, but supporting what they want to support is totally legal. Though the company will lose some of the customers. So how should the government inforce to prevent the discrimination?